Let the cries of “partisanship!” begin. The bi-partisan, Republican chaired 9/11 Commission has stated that there was evidence of a link between June 16th, 2004 Iraq | 7 comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Royalty was like dandelions. No matter how many heads you chopped off, the roots were still there underground, waiting to spring up again.
It seemed to be a chronic disease. It was as if even the most intelligent person had this little blank spot in their heads where someone had written: "Kings. What a good idea." Whoever had created humanity had left in a major design flaw. It was its tendency to bend at the knees.
-- Terry Pratchett, Feet of Clay
No one alleged there was a link between the New York times and Al Qaeda. Well, that i know of.
Comment 6/16/2004
Anyone saying otherwise, at this point, is lying.
Oh and i read where cheney recently stated there was a link, which jeff goldstein dubbed cleavage, implying there may be more to come.
Comment 6/16/2004
“No one alleged there was a link between the New York times and Al Qaeda. Well, that i know of.”
Well, you know, there have been so many rationales for Iraq …
Thanks for the catch.
Comment 6/16/2004
The Bush Admin has NEVER stated that Saddan was directly involved in 9/11. The Comission findings never stated that there wasn’t a link between Saddam and Al-Qaida, only that there was no proof Saddam was involved with Al-Quaida in the 9/11 attacks.
Of course the liberal media is spinning the findings as usual to attack the Bush Administration. *Yawn*
Comment 6/17/2004
Wrong again flounder
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/6/17/185436/985
Comment 6/17/2004
I heard there was no link on Fox News. Is that the “liberal” media?
Comment 6/19/2004
if there was no link between osama bin laden and Iraq, then why does the third paragraph of the federal grand jury indictment of OBL and his pariticipation in the 93 bombing of the WTC begin with OBL’s cooperation from Iraq and Saddam?
Comment 7/7/2004