Some Straight Talk on Kerry by Dawn

Excellent article from Tom Oliphant (Boston Globe columnist) at The American Prospect on Kerry’s political career and the reasons for supporting him this year other than “anybody but Bush.” He paints a compelling picture of Kerry as authentic, intelligent, and hard-working, with a willingness to learn from his own mistakes and to do the ground-level grunt work necessary to succeed honestly. Conceding that Kerry’s not a political natural, or personally exciting, he finds a lot of substance in his career and eventual Presidency.


In today’s political culture, progressives tend to be neurotic, conservatives fanatical.

The best cure for this neurosis is not artificially induced adulation but a rational decision to recognize Kerry’s strengths. This is a contemplative, serious person — well-grounded in progressive principles — who has the good habit of getting interested in new ideas that survive scrutiny. His work habits reveal an iron butt for grunt work, as well as considerable experience in working across party lines. A non-Bush president will have to repair considerable damage abroad and at home, complex tasks that will resist grand fixes and reward the patience and tough negotiating that are Kerry attributes. But a non-Bush president will also have to think and act big and new, and the work Kerry has already done on a range of issues should inspire confidence.

He is a sober yet imaginative person for sobering, dangerous times, but his looks and wealth conceal the steel that got him this far and often cause him to be underestimated.

He has an interesting review of Kerry’s political career and what it says about him as a person and as a leader. He also gives an intelligent overview of Kerry’s key policy initiatives that both explains Kerry and serves as a guide to the issues. The article is worth reading just for the discussion here.


Normally, positions on issues don’t work well for me as clues to a presidency, or as stand-alone reasons to be for someone. In Kerry’s case, however, he has made three contributions — in health care, on energy, and in foreign policy — to the national discussion over the past year that are vintage Kerry and powerful evidence of how his political mind works. They are not derivative, and, in each instance, the contributions were formulated not by the pollsters or the advisers but by Kerry himself.

His conclusion could be the slogan for Kerry supporters everywhere:


John Kerry is a good, tough man. He is curious, grounded after a public and personal life that has not always been pleasant, a fan of ideas whose practical side has usually kept him from policy wonkery, a natural progressive with the added fixation on what works that made FDR and JFK so interesting. I know it is chic to be disdainful, but the modern Democratic neurosis gets in the way of a solid case for affection. Without embarrassment, and after a very long journey, I really like this guy. As one of his top campaign officials, himself a convert since the primaries ended, told me recently, this is pure Merle Haggard. It’s not love, but it’s not bad.

Give it a read.

Link via Mark A.R. Kleiman.

3 Comments

Ms. Not TogetherJuly 23rd, 2004

My husband is a gun enthusiast (not a gun nut). I don’t really know why, but he’s convinced Kerry is the Anti-Christ.
Any ideas as to how I can bring him around? Or do I just have to write him off?

Kevin T. KeithJuly 23rd, 2004

Hmmm . . . well, I wouldn’t show him this, from Project VoteSmart:

Gun Issues

2003 On the votes that the The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence considered to be the most important as of 2003, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time. . . .

2003 Based on the results of a questionnaire the Gun Owners of America assigned Senator Kerry a 10

2002 On the votes that the The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence considered to be the most important as of 2002, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time. . . .

2002 Based on lifetime voting records on gun issues and the results of a questionnaire sent to all Congressional candidates in 2002, the National Rifle Association assigned Senator Kerry a grade of F . . .

2001-2002 Based on the results of a questionnaire the Gun Owners of America assigned Senator Kerry a grade of F . . .

1999-2000 On the votes that the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence considered to be the most important in 1999-2000 , Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

1999-2000 Based on the results of a questionnaire the Gun Owners of America assigned Senator Kerry a grade of F- . . .

You could try showing him this profile from OnTheIssues.org, which is a bit more mainstream:

Gun owner & hunter, but rights come with responsibility
John Kerry is a gun owner and hunter, and he believes that law-abiding American adults have the right to own guns. But like all of our rights, gun rights come with responsibilities, and those rights allow for reasonable restrictions to keep guns out of the wrong hands. John Kerry strongly supports all of the federal gun laws on the books, and he would take steps to ensure that they are vigorously enforced, cracking down hard on the gun runners, corrupt dealers, straw buyers, and thieves that are putting guns into the hands of criminals in the first place. He will also close the gun show loophole, which is allowing criminals to get access to guns at gun shows without background checks, fix the background check system, which is in a serious state of disrepair, and require that all handguns be sold with a child safety lock. [From the Kerry campaign Web site]

Supports assault weapons ban & Brady Bill . . .

Voted YES on background checks at gun shows.
Require background checks on all firearm sales at gun shows.

Voted NO on more penalties for gun & drug violations.
The Hatch amdt would increase mandatory penalties for the illegal transfer or use of firearms, fund additional drug case prosecutors, and require background check on purchasers at gun shows. [A YES vote supports stricter penalties].
[Note: it's not clear whether Kerry's objection was to increased gun-crime penalties or increased drug prosecutions.]

Voted NO on loosening license & background checks at gun shows.
Vote to table or kill a motion to require that all gun sales at gun shows be completed by federally licensed gun dealers. Also requires background checks to be completed on buyers and requires gun show promoters to register with the Treasury.

Voted NO on maintaining current law: guns sold without trigger locks.
Vote to table [kill] an amendment to make it unlawful for gun dealers to sell handguns without providing trigger locks. [I.e., Kerry voted to require trigger locks with all gun sales.]

Prevent unauthorized firearm use with “smart gun” technology.

Kerry [also] signed the manifesto, “A New Agenda for the New Decade”:

Make America the “Safest Big Country” in the World
After climbing relentlessly for three decades, crime rates started to fall in the 1990s. Nonetheless, the public remains deeply concerned about the prevalence of gun violence, especially among juveniles, and Americans still avoid public spaces like downtown retail areas, parks, and even sports facilities.

We need to keep policing “smart” and community-friendly, prohibiting unjust and counterproductive tactics such as racial profiling; focus on preventing as well as punishing crime; pay attention to what happens to inmates and their families after sentencing; use mandatory testing and treatment to break the cycle of drugs and crime; and enforce and strengthen laws against unsafe or illegal guns. Moreover, we need a renewed commitment to equal justice for all, and we must reject a false choice between justice and safety.

Technology can help in many areas: giving police more information on criminal suspects so they do not rely on slipshod, random stop-and-search methods; allowing lower-cost supervision of people on probation or parole; and making it possible to disable and/or trace guns used by unauthorized persons.

Above all, we need to remember that public safety is the ultimate goal of crime policy. Until Americans feel safe enough to walk their neighborhood streets, enjoy public spaces, and send their children to school without fear of violence, we have not achieved public safety.

To be honest, if your husband is convinced anyone for moderate gun regulations is “the Anti-Christ” then you may have to give up on him.

Abject FunkJuly 23rd, 2004

The Shizzle…
Well, this post, via Lean Left, just made my day. Lean Left is on my blogroll and definitely worth taking the time to look at whenever you can. I like Kerry, although I was all about Dean earlier in the