<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Movie List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2005/12/06/4972/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2005/12/06/4972/</link>
	<description>The View From the Sinister Side of Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:24:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Len Cleavelin</title>
		<link>http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2005/12/06/4972/comment-page-1/#comment-28721</link>
		<dc:creator>Len Cleavelin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 14:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanleft.com/?p=4972#comment-28721</guid>
		<description>I disagree that ED2 is a shot for shot remake; there are enough differences IMHO that it qualifies as a &quot;sequel&quot;, and of course the ending sets up &lt;em&gt;Army of Darkness&lt;/em&gt;. However, the &quot;Is ED2 a remake or a sequel?&quot; question has been one that the &lt;em&gt;Evil Dead&lt;/em&gt; fandom has been debating for years, and it&#039;s not gonna stop now.

My own take on the series (and I own all three on DVD and watched all of them extensively):

&lt;em&gt;Evil Dead&lt;/em&gt; is a low budget horror flick, plain and simple. There&#039;s a little comic relief, but not any more than typical for the genre.

&lt;em&gt;Evil Dead 2&lt;/em&gt; is a horror/comedy--it sits squarely in the horror genre, but Sam Raimi has added many more strictly comedic elements (including his statutorily required Three Stooges homages). In effect, it&#039;s a horror flick mocking the genre (but not self-referentially so, like the &lt;em&gt;Scream&lt;/em&gt; series).

&lt;em&gt;Army of Darkness&lt;/em&gt; is a comedy spoofing the swords and sorcery genre (I have wrapped my mind around the question for a few years, but I can&#039;t bring myself to classify AoD as a horror flick). But for the beginning of AoD (which summarizes ED2 for everyone jumping on the wagon with AoD), there&#039;s not a lot linking AoD to the earlier &lt;em&gt;Evil Dead&lt;/em&gt; entries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree that ED2 is a shot for shot remake; there are enough differences IMHO that it qualifies as a &#8220;sequel&#8221;, and of course the ending sets up <em>Army of Darkness</em>. However, the &#8220;Is ED2 a remake or a sequel?&#8221; question has been one that the <em>Evil Dead</em> fandom has been debating for years, and it&#8217;s not gonna stop now.</p>
<p>My own take on the series (and I own all three on DVD and watched all of them extensively):</p>
<p><em>Evil Dead</em> is a low budget horror flick, plain and simple. There&#8217;s a little comic relief, but not any more than typical for the genre.</p>
<p><em>Evil Dead 2</em> is a horror/comedy&#8211;it sits squarely in the horror genre, but Sam Raimi has added many more strictly comedic elements (including his statutorily required Three Stooges homages). In effect, it&#8217;s a horror flick mocking the genre (but not self-referentially so, like the <em>Scream</em> series).</p>
<p><em>Army of Darkness</em> is a comedy spoofing the swords and sorcery genre (I have wrapped my mind around the question for a few years, but I can&#8217;t bring myself to classify AoD as a horror flick). But for the beginning of AoD (which summarizes ED2 for everyone jumping on the wagon with AoD), there&#8217;s not a lot linking AoD to the earlier <em>Evil Dead</em> entries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2005/12/06/4972/comment-page-1/#comment-28592</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 07:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanleft.com/?p=4972#comment-28592</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Never saw the first Evil Dead, only Evil Dead 2: Dead By Dawn and Army of Darkness, and I have to say that Evil Dead 2 is the more underrated of the two.&lt;/i&gt;

ED2 was just a shot-for-shot remake of the original no-budget ED. Some poor souls, though, think that low production values make is ipso facto the better movie. 

&lt;i&gt;…it surprises me that Joe would have anything at all nice to say about anything involving Janeane Garofalo.&lt;/i&gt;

I have long had a low-level crush on Garofalo. I think she can be charming and funny when she is not being a raving loon. I can understand being passionate about politics but from watching her career I think it is more of an internalized neuroses that makes her the third-rate Al Franken clone she has become today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Never saw the first Evil Dead, only Evil Dead 2: Dead By Dawn and Army of Darkness, and I have to say that Evil Dead 2 is the more underrated of the two.</i></p>
<p>ED2 was just a shot-for-shot remake of the original no-budget ED. Some poor souls, though, think that low production values make is ipso facto the better movie. </p>
<p><i>…it surprises me that Joe would have anything at all nice to say about anything involving Janeane Garofalo.</i></p>
<p>I have long had a low-level crush on Garofalo. I think she can be charming and funny when she is not being a raving loon. I can understand being passionate about politics but from watching her career I think it is more of an internalized neuroses that makes her the third-rate Al Franken clone she has become today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
