Music Industry: CD to IPod transfer Illegal
Feb 17
The RIAA is arguing that you have no right to make copies of your CDs or transfer them to your iPod:
The [submitted arguments in favor of granting exemptions to the DMCA] provide no arguments or legal authority that making back up copies of CDs is a noninfringing use. In addition, the submissions provide no evidence that access controls are currently preventing them from making back up copies of CDs or that they are likely to do so in the future. Myriad online downloading services are available and offer varying types of digital rights management alternatives. For example, the Apple FairPlay technology allows users to make a limited number of copies for personal use. Presumably, consumers concerned with the ability to make back up copies would choose to purchase music from a service that allowed such copying. Even if CDs do become damaged, replacements are readily available at affordable prices. Similar to the motion picture industry, the recording industry has faced, in online piracy, a direct attack on its ability to enjoy its copyrights.
According to the music industry, you cannot take your CD collection and put it on your iPod - -you have to buy it all over again. You cannot burn your disk so that you have a copy for the car and the office - -you have to purchase a separate disk. You cannot make copies of your CDs and store the originals offsite, in order to protect them. Since you can always buy replacements (except when you don’t have the money or the CD is no longer in print), the RIAA thinks that you shouldn’t be allowed to back up your CDs.
This is a direct attack on your fair use rights and it has nothing to do with piracy. The RIAA is trying to use copyright laws to force you to spend more money than you should to be able to enjoy music that you have already purchased. They want you to have to ask their permission to do any number of things that you have always been able to do in the past. And since the alternative to giving you permission is forcing you to give them more money, permission will not, in all likelihood, be forthcoming. And what is worse is that they fully intend to use technology to take away those fair use rights whatever the courts may say.
There are already CDs that will not allow themselves to be copied, and iTunes limits the number of computers that you can play the song you just bough on. Fortunately in the case of iTunes, the number is large enough to encompass almost anyone’s home network, but that fact remains that Apple, under pressure from the RIAA, is using technology to prevent you from listening to music you bought in the means you see fit for your personal consumption.
Piracy and file sharing concerns are a smokescreen. The RIAA is interested only in using the courts, Congress, and technology to protect their outdated business model and ensure that they balance their books on your backs.
#1 by Eric Jaffa at February 17th, 2006
| Quote
Are there any bands which sell MP3s of their songs at their own websites, without signing with a record company?
#2 by FuzzFlash at February 18th, 2006
| Quote
Stuff the music industry. They have been ruthlessly exploiting musicians, singer/songwriters and music lovers for too long. Since the corps hobbled Napster and co.a new file sharing system has emerged that effectively sidelines the greedy bastards. It’s called bittorrent.com ; Takes a little longer to download all the bits but you can download anything you want. We all breathe oxygen which is presently free and themusic belongs to us all. I know many artists who solely market thenselves ,their tours and their “Products”. CD’s, DVDs etc.are sold by the artist at gigs for cash. While none are materially rich, they don’t answer to the man , have fascinating lifestyles of frugal comfort at home, tour when they feel like it and are genuinely happy to be captains of their own destiny.
People come to hear them live because those same people initially heard and got to dig them via free downloads. With bittorrent the music will never die
#3 by rMatey at February 18th, 2006
| Quote
to protect their outdated business model and ensure that they balance their books on your backs…..
If they anywhere near serious about piracy they should take one quick look at China. I can’t excuse a company that hires a Red corp to make CDs and DVDs, then runs a few thousand extra copies for sale for themselves. If they were interesated in stopping piracy they would attack the biggest offenders first.
#4 by Rafael at February 18th, 2006
| Quote
Hell, with podcasting I can dowload hours of radio with no commercial interruptions or fear of the RIAA get all rilled up. [Started downloading Trance podcast from the web] I don’t use KAZAA or any of those services (I do use Altavista, but that is another story).
I bought the music, I own the music.
#5 by henderstock at February 18th, 2006
| Quote
Nobody likes these music industry suits, except perhaps the politicians whose pockets they line. They have always screwed the artists and now they’re screwing the consumers as well. I say screw them–in every way possible. Some day we’ll be able to eliminate the middleman entirely, and everyone but the parasites will be happy.
#6 by dloberk at February 18th, 2006
| Quote
I’ve already bloody purchased many titles over and over again e.g., vinyl LP, 8-track (remember that folks?), cassette, CD, and even legitimate iTunes downloads when unable to locate CD. THEY owe me! Screw ‘em.
#7 by old school at February 18th, 2006
| Quote
many moons ago, I worked for Warner Bros….back then they were a powerhouse…if you want Madonna or Led Zeppelin, well they had it…
they took their eyes off the ball a while back and have been trying to regain a footing…but the reality is that all music companies are trying to regain a footing.
simple stated, the genie is out of the bottle and there is no way people are going to put up with RIAA…at least there is no way a generation of folks raised on computers are going to put up with their crap.
they can fight it all they want, but the truth is that music delivery has changed…and once the delivery was changed, so too the idea of music.
#8 by Fuck the RIAA at February 18th, 2006
| Quote
Hey you know what. I believe that every fucking song ever played on the radio is open market. Yes, due to them having been paid by the radio station, and me having to listen to the piece o crap advertisments to finally get to hea rthe song, I was then allowed to record said song for my own enjoyment, and…So was everyone else who happened to ever hear said song on said airwaves. SO in effect, everyone is allowed to have a copy of said song, since it already reached their ears via a method that is wholly paid for.
So, I then can share said song with my firends and acqauintences as long as they say they have heard it on the radio EVER.
Period.
Just use Audacity to record ANYTHING that comes out your sound card.
http://audacity.sourceforge.net/
FUCK THE RIAA
#9 by Arthur Trevaskis at March 2nd, 2006
| Quote
As a songwriter and copyright holder, I despise those who copy copyrighted material to give or sell to others.
On the other hand, to copy your purchased record/audio tape/CD, etc to MP3 or similar for your own use is considered “fair use” by me and many of my peers.
The record Company’s have been ripping off artists and songwriters like myself for ever, and are still trying to do so.
So are those that steal copyrighted material.
Fair go chaps - I have to eat!