Comments on: A Continuation of Comments

By: Men’s parental responsibilities, distilled down to a simple logical argument. at Standard Mischief

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:15:42 +0000

[...] I envision the woman should inform the father shortly into her pregnancy, and the man should have to reply promptly, giving the woman time to chose from the (not so secret, actually pretty obvious) choices of, abortion of the fetus, adoption of the child, choosing to raise the child herself as a single parent, or finding a surrogate father to adopt and share legal custody (That’s not meant as a jab at tgirsch, but he did tell me that I came off as a “paranoid misogynist”, so whatever). [...]

By: anatasia

anatasia — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 07:19:21 +0000

Pregnancy is like a boon for a married women. Pregnancy means a lot of joy for the women who is pregnant as she is about to deliver her offsprings. The excitement is quite different. The women began to take more care of them as their baby's health who is inside the womd depends upon them. one can find helpful tips regarding pregnancy here.

By: Ted

Ted — Sun, 21 May 2006 19:20:01 +0000

IT IS SAD THAT ALL THE CHICKS HAVE LEFT IS THE BUSH THING. THE PUBLICITY THIS WILL GET THEM IS NOT THE KINDS THAT SELL RECORDS. IN THIS DAY AND TIME WHEN ALL MUSIC CAN BE DOWNLOADED THEY DO NOT NEED TO PUSH ANY MORE BUTTONS. WAITING THREE YEARS TO SAY I TOLD YOU SO IS COWARDLY. THESE WOMEN NEED TO GO BACK TO WOKING AT THE MALL WHERE ALL OF THE OTHER TEENAGERS HANG OUT. I USED TO LIKE THE MUSIC, I WOULD HAVE FORGOTTEN WHAT THEY SAID BUT TO GRAB ON TO IGNORANCE FOR PUBLICITY IS STUPID. GOOD LUCK THEY WILL NOT GET MY MONEY.

By: Redneck in CA

Redneck in CA — Mon, 15 May 2006 16:15:45 +0000

Let me start by saying that I consider myself a conservative, but I do not follow anyone blindly. I disagree with many things our current administration does. I was mad at the Dixie Chicks when they slammed our President and I boycotted their music which is my choice. I was however willing to give them a second chance and put that past us. Now they have slammed their entire base with there latest comments about Rednecks! Maybe it is a diffence in how people interpret the term Redneck but to many who listen to Country music it represents our Country heritage and they just slammed 90% of their listeners. So I have one thing to say “Fairwell Dixie Chicks” that was the final blow!!

By: Standard Mischief

Standard Mischief — Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:22:33 +0000

Men’s parental responsibilities, distilled down to a simple logical argument.

First, a few assumptions that you may or may not agree with…

…

By: tgirsch

tgirsch — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:39:06 +0000

Hey, I’m not the one who introduced terms like “Inner-bitch feminists” to the debate. Also, it doesn’t help that you started out here with an only-marginally-on-topic rant that calls into question the very integrity of “a large amount of the people who call themselves feminists.”

So it’s not as if you came in here as Mr. Level-Headed Picture of Rationality. Thou reapest what thou sowest.

By: Standard Mischief

Standard Mischief — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 03:10:00 +0000

Remind me again, why am I here? Because you are such a polite and charming guy, even with people you disagree with?

By: tgirsch

tgirsch — Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:03:43 +0000

I’m not sure if you were aiming for “paranoid misogynist,” but you hit a bulls-eye!

By: Standard Mischief

Standard Mischief — Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:36:20 +0000

Sorry for not jumping right on top of this, I’ve been involved with this thread:

http://www./blog/archives/2006/03/21/half-assed-post-on-that-roe-for-men-ridiculousness/

She starts out saying that it’s already been covered in detail by three other bloggers, then it goes to over 200 comments after 24 hours or so before comments were cut off.

It was particularly fun when I pointed out the unequal protection under the law in those “anti-dead dumpster baby” laws we were talking about.

You can read the fun, but apparently zuzu thinks “equal protection under the law” applies only when it helps women.

Maybe I didn’t get the memo, but apparently a large amount of people who call themselves Feminists aren’t seeking equity, they seem to want any advantage at all that they can grab, and are ready to switch camps at a moments notice (and you may tell that I got a bit pissed over this in the end). Example:

libertarian Feminists: “Keep your laws off my body”, “My body, My choice” etc.

Commie Feminists: Free state funded abortion on demand.

Fascist (in the government control over private property sense) Feminists: Force Wal-mart to carry plan B.

Inner-bitch Feminists: “Off-topic and mean, but I know someone who went to school with that woman, and she is batshit crazy. And wears a fur hat to class. The MRAs can keep her. Just saying.”

And to top it all off, NOW also apparently made a comment on the “Roe v. Wade for Men” case. Believe it or not, they sided with the rights of the child (and not the “unborn child” or “fetus” either). What’s up with that?

I don’t know if this ends up as blog post or what. But I’m trying to get the actual legal filed papers for this for any entry. Please excuse if I don’t get back here right away.

By: tgirsch

tgirsch — Thu, 23 Mar 2006 20:57:29 +0000

[SM] A woman has reproductive rights after conception. a man ought to also, as long as those rights don’t interfere with a woman’s right over her own body .

I would add and as long as those “rights” don’t absolve him of responsibility.