Clinton vs. Ailes
by KevinSeptember 28th, 2006
So Roger Ailes thinks Clinton’s response to Chris Wallace was “an attack on all journalists.” Having finally seen the entire interview, I think it is pretty clear that Wallace both tried to sandbag Clinton and then, when that failed, interrupted and cut Clinton off repeatedly in an attempt to change the subject to anything else. Frankly, Wallace was treated with more respect by Clinton than he showed Clinton.
Poor widdle Clinton. Someone asked him a question. How dare an interviewer ask him a question that made him uncomfortable? Boo Hoo Hoo!
You must have seen a different interview than I did. Clinton ran on and on and wouldn’t let Wallace get a word in crossways.
Wallace should have slapped Clinton’s bony finger out of the way and told him to quit poking at him. Frankly, Clinton was treated with more respect by Wallace than he showed Wallace.
That was a waste of time post if i ever saw one. Wallace is like: “got email from viewers, DONT UNDERSTAND why they all wanna know…” ya, RIGHT! Let me just state the obvious: 1- Fox is biased (no need to elaborate, just watch Fox (no don’t))2- “Poor widdle Clinton” makes so much sense, its refreshing, and above all, he’s right. Why don’t you try listening to the words he says 3- Wallace didn’t need to get a word in, As Kevin mentioned he just didn’t want us to get to hear him and obvviously, Fred, you were mesmerized by all his smirking. And don’t put the words “Chris Wallace” and “respect” together in a sentence ever again, unless it’s concerning someone who agrees with Chris Wallace.
YaOkay Says:
September 28th, 2006
That was a waste of time post if i ever saw one.
Fred: That was a waste of time post if I ever saw one.
Fred, read the transcript. Wallace tried to interrupt Clinton repeatedly. The fact of the matter is: Wallace asked for it, and when he got what he deserved, he tried to back out of it.
Dan Says:
September 30th, 2006
Fred, read the transcript. Wallace tried to interrupt Clinton repeatedly. The fact of the matter is: Wallace asked for it, and when he got what he deserved, he tried to back out of it.
Fred: Wallace kept trying to interrupt Clinton because Clinton wouldn’t pause long enough for Wallace to ask his questions. An interview is not the place for a one-sided speech.
I’m sure this isn’t just your biased speculation and that you actually consulted Wallace and Clinton on the matter… thanks Fred for clearing that up.