Morals and Family Values
Oct 5
A blogger named Wild Bill outed the identity of one of the pages that was a victim of Mark Foley. That, in and of itself, was bad enough but, fortunately, Wild Bill doesn’t get much traffic. Unfortunately, Glenn Reynolds and Paul Roger Simon — too of the largest right wing bloggers, linked to the post outing the victim. (UPDATE: Sorry, wriote this in a hurry. Insty linked to Simon’s post linking to Wild Bill. Should have been clearer, sorry) I would ask if Reynolds and Simon have any shame, any decency, any moral calling higher than protecting the Republican party, but what would be the point? The answer seems pretty clear.
#1 by SayUncle at October 5th, 2006
| Quote
I went over and checked out the site of wild bill. doesn’t look like insty linked to his post on the identity but some post about glenn being the anti-christ.
#2 by Les Jones at October 5th, 2006
| Quote
I’m having trouble piecing this together, too. What Instapundit post are you talking about?
#3 by Kevin at October 5th, 2006
| Quote
Sorry, wrote this in a hurry. Insty linked to Simon’s post linkig to Wild Bill. Should have been clearer, sorry
#4 by Les Jones at October 5th, 2006
| Quote
I found the Instapundit link here. Read it and judge the intent for yourself.
#5 by Kevin at October 5th, 2006
| Quote
Yep — he liked to someone linking the outing. But, of course, he will try to hide behind is lame “but I only linked!I didn’t agree” crap when called on it. No one of decent morals or character would lik to either the outing or people who liked to the outing. Period.
#6 by WWB at October 5th, 2006
| Quote
Actually, Reynolds didn’t even mention that there was this particular information to be found at those links. Simon didn’t even mention it either, though he did link. I disapprove of the Wild Bill post too, but let’s not get carried away here.