« Previous | Next »

Damn You, Publius!
Posted by tgirsch

“Thanks” to Publius at Obsidian Wings for linking to this tripe. It has to be read to be believed. (And I recommend that you resist clicking and don’t read it. For the love of all that is good and holy.)

The Readers’ Digest version can be distilled thus:

  1. Waaah! Angry liberals are calling me mean names!
  2. My dark skin excuses my ignorance on racial issues.
  3. 9/11 is Jimmy Carter’s fault.
  4. I don’t hate America.
  5. Waaah! Stephen Colbert was mean to me!
  6. Al-Qaeda hates us because of Planned Parenthood.
  7. I didn’t say it was the fags’ fault that we were attacked on 9/11. It’s because of our tolerance of the fags. So, in that sense, it’s our fault.
  8. We can solve our middle east problems by dividing Islam against itself.
  9. I am not a hack! I am a Scholar!
  10. Liberals want the enemy to win in Iraq so they can use that against Bush, and thus protect the fags and the abortionists.

I think that pretty much sums it up.

UPDATE: How could I forget?

  1. I have no ability whatsoever to differentiate between the rhetoric leaders use to whip up a furor, and their actual goals.

January 29th, 2007 Politics | 5 comments

5 Comments »

  1. Kevin T. Keith writes:

    Without looking, I’m guessing this is Dinesh D’Souza. Christ he’s a hack.

    Comment 1/30/2007

  2. Dan writes:

    No… he’s a scholar, read the article silly.

    Comment 1/30/2007

  3. tgirsch writes:

    KTK:

    Excellent guess! :) And not looking is a grand idea.

    Comment 1/30/2007

  4. Dan M. writes:

    As a conservative author, I’m used to a little controversy.

    I love the opening sentence as an object lesson about how screwed up our political terms are. The definition of ‘conservative’ is “keeping that which is well known”. He’s an athoritarian apologist. That’s not very traditional, at least not in America.

    Comment 1/30/2007

  5. Dan M. writes:

    Not that it needs reiterating…

    Comment 2/2/2007

Leave a comment