Time for Aggressive Therapy
Posted by KTK

Charles Karel Bouley, at the Huffington Post, has a lacerating column today that is breathtaking for its incisiveness and audacity.

He riffs on the recent cancer-related stories in the media, and has a few testy things to say about Tony Snow, so, unquestionably, the wingers will quote two angry sentences from it, dump their usual vitriol on the blogger, and scamper, still blissfully oblivious. But for those who can read and think and who try to care, here’s the medicine you need:

if [CNN] wants to do some good, they’ll talk about the real cancers in this country, and there are plenty; no, not the tumors growing in Elizabeth or the lesions in Tony Snow, but the terminal cancers festering in the political system, in the heartland of America, and on the news networks.

First, let’s talk about the cancer that is festering in the American news media. . . . Our news is one step short of Entertainment Tonight, Inside Edition or American’s Most Wanted. Our journalists don’t ask tough questions, don’t do much research, take press releases as fact, report things from the web that have no basis in fact, and if a celebrity OD’s they go in to overdrive. And we, the nation, are dying because of this. . . .

What about the cancer that is in Washington D.C. these days? We’ll call it elected official fearanoma. I openly laughed this week when I read the Chuck Hagels interview where he said that if things don’t change he’s aware that impeachment is a possible solution. . . . So, Mr. Hagel, you FINALLY read the Constitution? It just dawned on you that impeachment is an option when the president has become a dictator? Please, keep reading, it’s a good document. . . . [B]ecause some of you are running for president, others running for reelection and yet others living in some haze of complacency. Your cancer is terminal. You are weakened by it and do nothing. You’re not taking aggressive steps to cure it.

And then there’s the possibly terminal case of Lack of Reality Carcinoma. We are at war and we, the people, sacrifice nothing, demand nothing, expect nothing. Instead of tax increases, you get a tax break. Instead of demanding that Hummer stop producing their gas guzzling completely unnecessary vehicles for the self indulgent and retool their factories to make the Cougar vehicles that are needed in Iraq to keep our troops safe from IEDs you rent limos made of these beasts . . . . Your light bill should be double, the same with gas at the pump. Why? To make the companies switch to green fuels, renewable resources. Most of you haven’t called your power company to see if you are getting greener energy, don’t know your carbon imprint on the planet, nothing. Why is this important? Because Osama attacked us because we have bases is Saudi Arabia. We are at war in Iraq protecting oil reserves and are about to go to war with Iran. We need to leave the middle east entirely and that means leave their oil behind. Not in 100 years, but now. We have the technology, but you have to pay for it. And you won’t. Do you go to city council meetings and demand that all new construction in your city is energy self-sufficient? Have you priced solar for your home? Do you drive a hybrid if you can? What’s the last thing you said to your Congressman? Senator? Sacrifice, we simply haven’t. Most of you haven’t even sacrificed your children, and that includes George Bush. For most of you, it ’s not your kids fighting. No, the cancer of apathy, of gluttony, of conspicuous consumption grows stronger every day. . . .

It is not a given that the U.S. will remain the world’s super power forever. In fact, history says it won’t. If we don’t cure these aggressive cancers growing in our media, in our government and in our society, we will fade away and become a shell of what we once were.

There’s more. Read it.

March 27th, 2007 General, Politics, Economics, Environment, Culture, Iraq, News & Current Events, Fiasco, Climate Change | 6 comments

6 Comments »

  1. Fred writes:

    “If we don’t cure these aggressive cancers growing in our media, in our government and in our society, we will fade away and become a shell of what we once were.”

    And it is the liberal cancer that is leading the way.

    Comment 3/27/2007


  2. Jodin writes:

    Well, on April 28th, there will be impeachment protests in towns and cities all over the country. And everywhere people will be using signs, their bodies, chalk, or anything else they can think of to spell out IMPEACH! Several cities have actions planned already, but we invite everybody to start thinking about the most creative, spectacular, beautiful, and clever ways they can come up with to spell it out. This is a spin-off of the BeachImpeach project on the shores of San Francisco where over 1,100 people spelled out “Impeach!” Find out what is going on in your town, or start your own project. Be a part of history and this media grabbing call to defend our Constitution through impeachment.

    Find the pre-existing events here

    Start your own action

    Find out more

    Impeach Bush Resources

    Comment 3/28/2007


  3. richard writes:

    Fred, what do you mean by “liberal cancer”? Was it the liberal cancer that led us into Iraq and gutted our Constitution?

    Comment 3/28/2007


  4. Andrew writes:

    “Was it the liberal cancer that led us into Iraq and gutted our constitution?”

    Typical left wing hyperbole…and yes, it is likely the liberals who have contributed to any “gutting of the constitution” that has occurred. Just take an objective look at the ever diminishing right of free speech on our college and university campus around the country.

    Comment 3/28/2007


  5. tgirsch writes:

    Just take an objective look at the ever diminishing right of free speech on our college and university campus around the country.

    Yes, because it was liberals who decried that guy in Colorado. And liberals who support the teacher in the “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” confiscation case. Yeah, right. We liberals sure do hate that free speech…

    You have to wonder, when hate crime legislation and campaign finance reform are unconscionable constitutional violations, but unsupervised warrantless searches and suspension of habeas corpus are A-OK…

    Comment 3/28/2007


  6. Dan M. writes:

    Wait, wait. Andrew, do you really think stretching the commerce clause is worse disregarding the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth?

    Comment 3/28/2007


Leave a comment