<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Latest Neocon Tactic: Preemptive Excuse-Making</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2008/10/01/6802/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2008/10/01/6802/</link>
	<description>The View From the Sinister Side of Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shirt</title>
		<link>http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2008/10/01/6802/comment-page-1/#comment-614850</link>
		<dc:creator>shirt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2008/10/01/6802/#comment-614850</guid>
		<description>There can only be one excuse for tonights performance: from http://www.backwoodshome.com/articles/geissal23.html

&quot;If you are butchering a pig, you will want to wash it down now. A pig is a clean animal in a natural environment but gets pretty dirty when confined.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There can only be one excuse for tonights performance: from <a href="http://www.backwoodshome.com/articles/geissal23.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.backwoodshome.com/articles/geissal23.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;If you are butchering a pig, you will want to wash it down now. A pig is a clean animal in a natural environment but gets pretty dirty when confined.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgirsch</title>
		<link>http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2008/10/01/6802/comment-page-1/#comment-614847</link>
		<dc:creator>tgirsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2008/10/01/6802/#comment-614847</guid>
		<description>Shorter &lt;b&gt;gattsuru&lt;/b&gt;:   &quot;Waaaaaahhhh!&quot;

:)

Say, where was all your pissing and moaning about the &quot;mugging&quot; during the awful ABC Clinton/Obama debate, in which the first hour was dedicated to nothing but &quot;gotcha&quot; questions?  If allegations of hypocrisy concerning selective outrage are what you&#039;re after, perhaps you should look in the mirror.

Finally, your citation of what I wrote is too clever by half.  I was talking about how the debate would be reported by the punditry (largely vindicated, by the way), not pre-emptively complaining about the debate being unfairly &lt;i&gt;conducted&lt;/i&gt; (because of something, by the way, that has been public knowledge for more than two months, but somehow is only just now being viewed as a problem...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shorter <b>gattsuru</b>:   &#8220;Waaaaaahhhh!&#8221;</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.leanleft.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Say, where was all your pissing and moaning about the &#8220;mugging&#8221; during the awful ABC Clinton/Obama debate, in which the first hour was dedicated to nothing but &#8220;gotcha&#8221; questions?  If allegations of hypocrisy concerning selective outrage are what you&#8217;re after, perhaps you should look in the mirror.</p>
<p>Finally, your citation of what I wrote is too clever by half.  I was talking about how the debate would be reported by the punditry (largely vindicated, by the way), not pre-emptively complaining about the debate being unfairly <i>conducted</i> (because of something, by the way, that has been public knowledge for more than two months, but somehow is only just now being viewed as a problem&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gattsuru</title>
		<link>http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2008/10/01/6802/comment-page-1/#comment-614774</link>
		<dc:creator>gattsuru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 06:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2008/10/01/6802/#comment-614774</guid>
		<description>For the love of humanity...

You realize that : &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.leanleft.com/archives/date/2008/09/26/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Couple that with the media’s love of a close race (whether one actually exists or not), and I’m concerned about how the debates will be reported.

All that said, this is Obama’s chance to really start opening up a lead, if he does well enough, and if the reporting is fair. Here’s hoping.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Is still on your front page?  I don&#039;t like claims of hypocrisy, for the simple reason that I have absolutely no clue what goes through your minds or even how the neurons are working, but that particular display makes Nancy Pelosi&#039;s display Tuesday or even my trains of thought paragons of linear logic.

I&#039;m sorry, we&#039;ve already had &lt;i&gt;this particular vice-presidential candidate&lt;/i&gt; so heavily mugged by questionably ethical journalistic methods that a quote aired suggesting she&#039;d start a war with friggen Russia, when the unedited transcript said economic sanctions.  You honestly want to argue that &lt;i&gt;writing a damned book on one of the tickets&lt;/i&gt; isn&#039;t an issue?

I currently do network design.  That job involves, at times, the testing and purchase of network hardware and software.  In my spare time, I happen to write both short fiction and non-fiction (no, the horrible tech manuals aren&#039;t always bad Engrish, sometimes it&#039;s folk like me).  Do you want to know what would happen if I tried to put together a report on router choices while writing a book called &lt;i&gt;Cisco 2800s for Dummies?&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;The Age of PANs&lt;/i&gt;?

I&#039;m not sure they&#039;d bother with a pink slip, since they could just probably institutionalize someone faster.

Given that the McCain camp claims that they weren&#039;t informed about the book until the last few days, and that negotiations involving the debates are well-recorded and thus that claim would be rather easily falsifiable if PBS has given even a hint of this book... 

Well, it&#039;s your prerogative to deny evidence when it&#039;s blinking you in the face, but given how often you rail against it and the typical historical effectiveness of such, I would have expected something better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the love of humanity&#8230;</p>
<p>You realize that :<br />
<blockquote><a href="http://www.leanleft.com/archives/date/2008/09/26/" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Couple that with the media’s love of a close race (whether one actually exists or not), and I’m concerned about how the debates will be reported.</p>
<p>All that said, this is Obama’s chance to really start opening up a lead, if he does well enough, and if the reporting is fair. Here’s hoping.&#8221;</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Is still on your front page?  I don&#8217;t like claims of hypocrisy, for the simple reason that I have absolutely no clue what goes through your minds or even how the neurons are working, but that particular display makes Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s display Tuesday or even my trains of thought paragons of linear logic.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, we&#8217;ve already had <i>this particular vice-presidential candidate</i> so heavily mugged by questionably ethical journalistic methods that a quote aired suggesting she&#8217;d start a war with friggen Russia, when the unedited transcript said economic sanctions.  You honestly want to argue that <i>writing a damned book on one of the tickets</i> isn&#8217;t an issue?</p>
<p>I currently do network design.  That job involves, at times, the testing and purchase of network hardware and software.  In my spare time, I happen to write both short fiction and non-fiction (no, the horrible tech manuals aren&#8217;t always bad Engrish, sometimes it&#8217;s folk like me).  Do you want to know what would happen if I tried to put together a report on router choices while writing a book called <i>Cisco 2800s for Dummies?</i> or <i>The Age of PANs</i>?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure they&#8217;d bother with a pink slip, since they could just probably institutionalize someone faster.</p>
<p>Given that the McCain camp claims that they weren&#8217;t informed about the book until the last few days, and that negotiations involving the debates are well-recorded and thus that claim would be rather easily falsifiable if PBS has given even a hint of this book&#8230; </p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s your prerogative to deny evidence when it&#8217;s blinking you in the face, but given how often you rail against it and the typical historical effectiveness of such, I would have expected something better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan M.</title>
		<link>http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2008/10/01/6802/comment-page-1/#comment-614742</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 03:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2008/10/01/6802/#comment-614742</guid>
		<description>your main link is live.  you can stop giving Malkin traffic and page rank.  Oh, and look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nofollow; it says that if you want to say that a link shouldn&#039;t be considered an endorsement, to do &quot;&lt;a rel=nofollow href=&quot;blah&quot;/&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your main link is live.  you can stop giving Malkin traffic and page rank.  Oh, and look at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nofollow</a>; it says that if you want to say that a link shouldn&#8217;t be considered an endorsement, to do &#8220;&lt;a rel=nofollow href=&#8221;blah&#8221;/&gt;&#8230;&lt;/a&gt;&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
