A Casual Disregard For Life
For all their talk of life, some pro-life pundits and leaders like Bill O’Reilly and Randall Terry have no regard for life. They do not care if Dr. Tiller was assassinated, and they will not care if their next target also meets a similar end. If they did care, they would not choose to use the most horrific terminology possible:
But there’s no other person who bears as much responsibility for the characterization of Tiller as a savage on the loose, killing babies willy-nilly thanks to the collusion of would-be sophisticated cultural elites, a bought-and-paid-for governor and scofflaw secular journalists. Tiller’s name first appeared on “The Factor” on Feb. 25, 2005. Since then, O’Reilly and his guest hosts have brought up the doctor on 28 more episodes, including as recently as April 27 of this year. Almost invariably, Tiller is described as “Tiller the Baby Killer.”
Tiller, O’Reilly likes to say, “destroys fetuses for just about any reason right up until the birth date for $5,000.” He’s guilty of “Nazi stuff,” said O’Reilly on June 8, 2005; a moral equivalent to NAMBLA and al-Qaida, he suggested on March 15, 2006. “This is the kind of stuff happened in Mao’s China, Hitler’s Germany, Stalin’s Soviet Union,” said O’Reilly on Nov. 9, 2006.
They would not say that Tiller had it coming:
Terry: The point that must be emphasized over, and over, and over again: pro-life leaders and the pro-life movement are not responsible for George Tiller’s death. George Tiller was a mass-murder and, horrifically, he reaped what he sowed.
Q: So who is responsible …
Terry: The man who shot him is responsible …
Q: … because that makes it sound like you were saying that he [Tiller] is responsible.
Terry: The man who shot him is responsible.
Q: What did you mean by “he reaped what he sowed”?
Terry: He was a mass-murder. He sowed death. And then he reaped death in a horrifying way.
O’Reilly and Terry may not be legally responsible for Tiller’s death (though there are hints of connections between Operation Rescue and the killer) but they certainly morally culpable. Each man knowingly used terminology that clearly stated that Tiller was a monster undeserving of life and they knowingly used such rhetoric with an audience with a known tendency for violence:
In the U.S., violence directed toward abortion providers has killed at least 9 people, including 5 doctors, 2 clinic employees, a security guard, and a clinic escort.[4]
* March 10, 1993: Dr. David Gunn of Pensacola, Florida was fatally shot during a protest. He had been the subject of wanted-style posters distributed by Operation Rescue in the summer of the year before. Michael F. Griffin was found guilty of Dr. Gunn’s murder and was sentenced to life in prison.
* June 29, 1994: Dr. John Britton and James Barrett, a clinic escort, were both shot to death outside of another facility in Pensacola. Rev. Paul Jennings Hill was charged with the killings, received a death sentence, and was executed September 3, 2003.
* December 30, 1994: Two receptionists, Shannon Lowney and Lee Ann Nichols, were killed in two clinic attacks in Brookline, Massachusetts. John Salvi, who prior to his arrest was distributing pamphlets from Human Life International,[5] was arrested and confessed to the killings. He committed suicide in prison and guards found his body under his bed with a plastic garbage bag tied around his head. Salvi had also confessed to a non-lethal attack in Norfolk, Virginia days before the Brookline killings.
* January 29, 1998: Robert Sanderson, an off-duty police officer who worked as a security guard at an abortion clinic in Birmingham, Alabama, was killed when his workplace was bombed. Eric Robert Rudolph, who was also responsible for the 1996 Centennial Olympic Park bombing, was charged with the crime and received two life sentences as a result.
* October 23, 1998: Dr. Barnett Slepian was shot to death at his home in Amherst, New York. His was the last in a series of similar shootings against providers in Canada and northern New York state which were all likely committed by James Kopp. Kopp was convicted of Dr. Slepian’s murder after finally being apprehended in France in 2001.
* May 31, 2009: Dr. George Tiller was shot and killed as he served as an usher at his church in Wichita, Kansas.[6]A fifth doctor, George Patterson, was shot and killed in Mobile, Alabama on August 21, 1993, but it is uncertain whether his death was the direct result of his profession or rather a robbery.[7]
[edit] Attempted murder, assault, and threats
According to statistics gathered by the National Abortion Federation (NAF), an organization of abortion providers, since 1977 in the United States and Canada, there have been 17 attempted murders, 383 death threats, 153 incidents of assault or battery, and 3 kidnappings committed against abortion providers.[8] The attempted murders were:[9][10][4]
* August 19, 1993: Dr. George Tiller was shot outside of an abortion facility in Wichita, Kansas. Shelley Shannon was charged with the crime and received an 31-year prison sentence.
* June 29, 1994: June Barret was shot in the same attack which claimed the lives of James Barrett, her husband, and Dr. John Britton.
* December 30, 1994: Five individuals were wounded in the same-day shootings which killed Shannon Lowney and Lee Ann Nichols.
* December 18, 1996: Dr. Calvin Jackson of New Orleans, Louisiana was stabbed 15 times, losing 4 pints of blood. Donald Cooper was charged with second-degree attempted murder and sentenced to 20 years.[11]
* October 28, 1997: Dr. David Gandell of Rochester, New York was injured by flying glass when a shot was fired through the window of his home.[12]
* January 29, 1998: Emily Lyons, a nurse, was severely injured in the bombing which also killed Robert Sanderson.[edit] Anthrax threats
The first letters claiming to contain anthrax were mailed to U.S. clinics in October 1998, a few days after the Slepian shooting, and since then, there have been a total of 655 such bioterror threats made against abortion providers. None of the “anthrax” in these cases was real.[13][9]
* November 2001: After the genuine 2001 anthrax attacks, Clayton Waagner mailed hoax letters containing a white powder to 554 clinics. Waagner was convicted of 51 charges relating to the anthrax scare on December 3, 2003.
[edit] Arson, bombing, and property crime
According to NAF, since 1977 in the United States and Canada, property crimes committed against abortion providers have included 41 bombings, 173 arsons, 91 attempted bombings or arsons, 619 bomb threats, 1630 incidents of trespassing, 1264 incidents of vandalism, and 100 attacks with butyric acid (“stink bombs”).[8] The first clinic arson occurred in Oregon in March 1976 and the first bombing occurred in February 1978 in Ohio.[14] More recent incidents have included:[4]
* December 25, 1984: An abortion clinic and two physicians’ offices in Pensacola, Florida were bombed in the early morning of Christmas Day by a quartet of young people (Matt Goldsby, Jimmy Simmons, Kathy Simmons, Kaye Wiggins) who later called the bombings “a gift to Jesus on his birthday.”[15][16][17]
* October 1999: Martin Uphoff set fire to a Planned Parenthood clinic in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, causing US$100 worth of damage. He was later sentenced to 60 months in prison.[18]
* May 28, 2000: An arson at a clinic in Concord, New Hampshire on resulted in damage estimated at US$20,000. The case remains unsolved.[19]
* September 30, 2000: A Catholic priest drove his car into the Northern Illinois Health Clinic after learning that the FDA had approved the drug RU-486. He pulled out an ax before being shot at by a security guard.[20]
* June 11, 2001: An unsolved bombing at a clinic in Tacoma, Washington destroyed a wall, resulting in US$6000 in damages. [18]
* July 4, 2005: A clinic Palm Beach, Florida was the target of an arson. The case remains open.[18]
* December 12, 2005: Patricia Hughes and Jeremy Dunahoe threw a Molotov cocktail at a clinic in Shreveport, Louisiana. The device missed the building and no damage was caused. In August 2006, Hughes was sentenced to six years in prison, and Dunahoe to one year. Hughes claimed the bomb was a “memorial lamp” for an abortion she had had there. [21]
* September 13, 2006 David McMenemy of Rochester Hills, Michigan crashed his car into the Edgerton Women’s Care Center in Davenport, Iowa. He then doused the lobby in gasoline and then started a fire. McMenemy committed these acts in the belief that the center was performing abortions, however Edgerton is not an abortion clinc.[22]
* April 25, 2007: A package left at a women’s health clinic in Austin, Texas contained an explosive device capable of inflicting serious injury or death. A bomb squad detonated the device after evacuating the building. Paul Ross Evans (who had a criminal record for armed robbery and theft) was found guilty of the crime. [23]
* May 9, 2007: An unidentified person deliberately set fire to a Planned Parenthood clinic in Virginia Beach, Virginia.[24]
* December 6, 2007: Chad Altman and Sergio Baca were arrested for the arson of Dr. Curtis Boyd’s clinic in Albuquerque. Altman’s girlfriend had scheduled an appointment for an abortion at the clinic. [25]
* January 22, 2009 Matthew L. Derosia, 32, who was reported to have had a history of mental illness [26]rammed a SUV into the front entrance of a Planned Parenthood clinic in St. Paul, Minnesota.[27]
O’Reilly and Terry, at a minimum acted with a level of irresponsibility that no one would accept from a five year old. At worst, they displayed a deliberate disregard for the life of Tiller and their other targets, deliberately choosing to make a demon out of a man and not caring what happened to them. They my not have pulled the trigger, but their behavior shows no sign that they care that someone did.
Whoa. A Kevin siting!
In principle, I’m actually okay with somebody not giving a fuck that somebody killed Tiller. Shit,I’m actually okay with somebody celebrating his death. I’m okay with somebody advocating that the world would be a better place without him. A person’s morals are his or her own. The contexts in which violence, and even murder, is acceptable, or even laudable to an individual are decisions that individual must make for him/herself. What I don’t accept is the attempts of such pundits to neuter their own ideology when under scrutiny in order to disingenuous shirk the responsibility of owning one’s feelings.
“I’m glad he’s dead; I’ll spit on his grave” is a completely legitimate response to Tiller’s desk if your underlying morality is in alignment. If you value the “lives” of X number of aborted fetuses over that of an actual humanbeing, then I can see having that reaction. (Your underlying presumption is intellectually shaky at best, but your feelings are internally consistent, so it makes sense to me). Just go out there and say it.
This reminds me of the Bill Maher fiasco when he noted that terrorists are not cowardly, but in their own way, rather courageous. Being courageous is a value-neutral sentiment. Those who feel Tiller deserved to die exhibit cowardice when not publicly taking ownership of such feelings. You can say what you want about Middle Eastern villagers who revel in and celebrate terror attacks against the West, but the one thing you must grant is that they own their own morality, as flawed as we may deem it. Shit, even the Bloods and Crips are generally honest about their collective ethos and values – it may not be right, but it’s what I believe and how I live.
If these self-righteous, sanctimonious blabbermouths are so damn proud of their morals, then why do they back awy from their feelings publicly. You can’t call him a one-man holocaust and then say that his death is a tragedy for which we, as humans, should grieve. It’s not intellectually consistent!
And, btw, don’t give me any of that love-the-sinner-hate-the-sin bullshit. The bile spewed at Tiller was obviously personal; so that ship has long left port.
The pink elephant here is that many of these people explicitly and proudly self-identify as Christians. So, either you’re glad he’s dead, or you’re a (good) Christian. Pick one! See, that’s what’s freeing about being an aetheist. By not identifying such a strict set of beliefs, you are able to claim a much more complex and contextually-driven interpretation of events without being a walking contradiction.
“but the one thing you must grant is that they own their own morality, as flawed as we may deem it.”
So Kevin you are saying that as long as you consistently adhere to your chosen moral code any act it leads you to commit is justified? So Nazi’s, terrorists, even, oh I don’t know, abortionists are all justified in what they do as long as they own their feelings about it, as long as they personally feel morally justified. Can’t you see the egregious social harm in that? Here is a great story that shows both sides of the Tiller story and the debate it has sparked: http://www.newsy.com/videos/the_killing_of_george_tiller
Rosa,
First, I think you’re talking to Digg, not Kevin.
Second, nobody’s actions are justified just because they’re consistent with their rhetoric. It’s that somebody’s rhetoric is hypocritical (not justified) if they denounce actions consistent with the rhetoric.
Rosa,
You were talking to me. I’m not going to say this any better than Dan, but…
Justified to whom? Who is to judge what actions are justified? Surely, the Nazi’s thought their acts were justified, as some of those who advocated the murder of Tiller thought this act was justified. I don’t think the actions of the Nazi’s were justified. I don’t think the murder of Tiller was justified. Society at large didn’t think either were justified.
What if somebody had the opportunity to murder Hitler earlier in his rise to power? Would killing Hitler be justified? Is murder ever justifiable? I dunno. That’s largely an individual question.
My point is that if you think Tiller was a monster who deserved to die – say so when asked. My only point about the exuberant celebrations for terror attacks against the West is that the people who engage in them don’t give a damn how their values are perceived with the rest of the world. They have sense of ownership and conviction that many of the militant anti-abortionists have in private but deny they have in public. This shouldn’t affect the way you judge either group’s actions. But it is something of a character issue.