Don’t celebrate just yet, Fred, it’s only for a week or so. I’ll be busy with my wife’s graduation from undergrad school this weekend, and then out on business and pleasure in Florida. I’ll be back on the fifteenth. Of course, Fred will probably accuse me of lying about all this…
May 5th, 2006
|
Bloggin, Travel |
one comment
So, I didn’t do to well in the first round, did I? So, for future refernece: if you use my picks for gambling purposes, large men with names like “Vito” will come and have long discussions with you about interest and debt repayment obligations. For the record, here is how I did in the first round:
- 1 Detroit vs. 8 Edmonton: Detroit in Five: WRONG Edmonton in six.
- 2 Dallas vs. 7 Colorado: Dallas in Six: WRONG Colorado in five.
- 3 Calgary vs. 6 Anaheim: Calgary in seven: WRONG Anaheimin seven. Should have given into temptation.
- 4 Nashville vs. 5 San Jose: San Jose in Five: RIGHT I even got the series length right!
- 1 Ottawa vs. 8 Tampa Bay: Ottawa sweeps: RIGHT Not a sweep, but still an easy win for the Senators.
- 2 Carolina vs. 7 Montreal:: Carolina in Six: RIGHT Again, nailed the length of the series.
- 3 New Jersey vs. 6 New York: Jersey in five: RIGHT Jersey swept. Man, did the Rangers look awful.
- No. 4 Buffalo vs. No. 5 Philadelphia: Philly in Seven: WRONG Buffalo in six. And It wasn’t even that close. the Sabres just looked dominate.
Ironically, I have seen far more Western Conference games than Eastern Cofnerence games. I think the fact that every underdog won testifies to the strength of the teams in the West. 4-4 overall. Good enough to make the playoffs in the NBA, so let’s continue.
First, out West:
- (5) San Jose v. (8) Edmonton This should be a fun series. San Jose has the best offenisive player left in Thornton, but he wasn’t really a factor in the first round. He may not be in the second, either: Edmonton plays very good defense and their goalie is top notch. Edmonton looked faster than Detroit, but Detroit is old and Legacy did not have a good series, letting in at least a handful of soft goals. San Jose in six.
- (6) Anaheim v. (7) Colorado. Colorado looked almost unstoppable in rolling over Dallas. They are firing on all cylindars and are better rested than Anaheim. Colorado in five.
Out East:
- (1) Ottawa v. (4) Buffalo: Another great series, but I think ottawa is the class of the East with good team skill, good defense, good speed and good goaltending. The Sabres’ team speed will win then a couple, but in the end, Ottawa is the more complete team. Ottawa in seven.
- (2) Carolina v. (3) New Jersey: Montreal showed that Carolina can be out-skated. Carolina won that series by emphasing defense and frustrating Montreal’s plan to play the series at a high octane pace. A slower pace won’t bother the Devils, and I think they are the more physical team. Carolina could try to do what they did in the regular season and turn on the jets, but Jersey has the ability to skate with them or to slow them down. Jersey in six.
May 5th, 2006
|
Sports, NHL |
5 comments
First, Haley Barbour, Governor of Mississippi, does this:
Barbour wears a lapel pin with the U.S. and state flags and he is in a photograph on the Web site of the Council of Conservative Citizens, a neo-Confederate group accused of racist views. Barbour says he doesn’t know anything about the council. The picture was taken at a council-sponsored barbecue in July used to raise money for private academy school buses.
(and anyone who believes that Barbour and his staff knew nothing of the well known CCC is a liar or an idiot. Barbour, by the way, refused to ask the racists to take his picture down.)
Then he does this:
Gov. Haley Barbour won’t grant a posthumous pardon to a black Korean War veteran who was wrongfully convicted in segregationist Mississippi after he tried to enroll in an all-white university.
Clyde Kennard was convicted of purchasing $25 worth of chicken feed he knew to be stolen in 1960 and sentenced to seven years in prison, but the only witness against him has recanted his testimony. Kennard died in 1963, after being released early because he had intestinal cancer.
Barbour agrees Kennard was wronged but says he won’t grant a pardon, despite calls for him to clear the man’s name.
So. Appear with known racists, refuse to ask known racists to take your photo of their web site, then refuse to pardon a black man now known to be innocent. Who could Barbour possibly be trying to impress? How many national Republicans will repudiate this former chair of the Republican National Committee?
May 5th, 2006
|
Politics |
13 comments